OK
The material selection platform
Adhesives Ingredients
The material selection platform
Adhesives Ingredients
Article

Factors that influence the adhesion

SpecialChem / Jan 1, 2008
Introduction

Factors that influence the adhesion - Introduction

The stronger adhesion of bonds between mechanically or chemically roughened surfaces is based on the enlargement of the effective surface (contact surface between the adhesive and the substrate), and an increase in the number of active centres, e. g. edges, corners, and faulty parts which, as in the heterogeneous catalysis, increase the interactive forces in the interface adhesive/surface.

The following factors have a predominant importance in the adhesion process:

Wetting of the surface

Factors that influence the adhesion - Wetting of the surface

To enable the adhesive bonds between the adhesive and the surface, the adhesive must first wet the surface; in other words, it must be applied in the liquid form (as a solution, dispersion, or hot-melt).

A measure for the wettability of a surface is the angle of contact that forms between a drop of liquid and a smooth, plain surface.

A good wetting occurs when the angle of contact () between the adhesive and the substrate is inferior to 90�. Complete wetting occurs when the molecular attraction between the liquid and solid molecules is greater than that between similar liquid molecules. Whether or not a given liquid will wet a solid depends on the surface tension of both substances, eg polymer and substrate.

The contact surface formed during wetting depends on the surface tension and the viscosity of the adhesive, and also on the structure (shape and size of the pores) of the surface. The size of the effective surface is generally smaller than the true surface of the substrate, because the pores and uneven parts of the surface are not completely filled by the adhesive.

Pressure may also help enhance the adhesion. Generally, bonds that have been set under pressure have higher adhesive strength. Pressures imparts better wetting and consequently a more complete interfacial contact.

The viscosity of the adhesive is critical to wetting, e.g.: the lower the viscosity, the more easily it will wet the substrate.
It is obvious to say that the rheological properties of the adhesive must be adapted to the application conditions (substrate's surface, curing time, pressure, temperature�).

Surface treatment

Factors that influence the adhesion - Surface treatment

All surfaces exposed to the normal atmosphere undergo gas and water adsorption in the molecular range; the surface condition can be also changed by oxidation processes.

To ensure a good adhesion it is sometimes necessary to carry out, particularly on metals, expensive mechanical and/or chemical pre-treatment (e.g. sandblasting and pickling). On the other hand, inert (too little reactive) plastics surfaces are activated by subjecting them to specific surface treatment for plastics (eg flame treatment, corona discharge�). In principle, these processes serve to form active centres and polar, reactive groups, which favour the wettability and the chemisorption of suitably pretreated surfaces.

The quality of the parts being joined is paramount for the quality of the bonded joint and, in particular, its resistance to ageing. The surface must therefore be suitably treated before the adhesive is applied. Wide-ranging methods of surface pretreatment exist. In every case, contaminants such as oil, grease, drawing and releasing agents, plasticizers, etc. must be removed with suitable cleaning agents.

Cleaning & degreasing Mechanical treatment Chemical & physical treatment
Removal of dust, oxides, remnants of paints and dirt Processing with hard and powered brushes of varying types (after degreasing) Picking of aluminium, hardened and stainless steel and hard metals
Surface priming Use of abrasive belts,disks, emery paper (120 to 180grain) etc. after degreasing Pickling of plastics which are difficult to bond, e.g. PTFE, POM and PP
Removal of unwanted contaminating films by degreasing/cleaning agents. Blasting treatments of all types (dry or wet) using a fine-grain sharp sand or shot Flame treatment, corona pretreatment, plasma treatment of plastics which are difficult to bond, e.g. PE, PA, PP...

In this connection, we should also mention coupling agents or adhesion promoters. These are in most cases bifunctional, low-molecular substances, e. g. titanates, chlorosilanes, and chromium complexes of unsaturated carboxylic acids, which fix the adhesive on the surface by chemical reactions. The mode of action of these adhesion promoters is based on their bifunctionality. One group reacts with reactive groups of the adherends, while the second group reacts with the adhesive.

It is advisable, therefore, to use adhesion promoters whose groups react differently or according to different types of reaction, e. g. by substitution or radical reaction.

Surface treatment for plastics

Factors that influence the adhesion - Surface treatment for plastics

Adhesive Abrading
Adhesive abrading is performed by abrading the plastic�s surface in the presence of liquid adhesive. Two of the abraded, adhesive-coated adherends are then mated, and the adhesive is allowed to cure. (This increases the bond strengths achieved on Teflon (PTFE) by approximately 700 percent). When abrasion is carried out in the presence of the adhesive, free radicals are created which react directly with the adhesive. This does not normally occur because the free radicals are scavenged by the oxygen present in air, or decay, before the adhesive is applied.

Common uses fluorocarbons

Chromic Acid Etching
Chromic acid etching increases the bondability of a plastic by introducing reactive sites, such as hydroxyl, carbonyl, carboxylic acid, and -SO3H groups, to the plastic�s surface and forming root-like cavities which provide sites for mechanical interlocking. The effects of this treatment vary from substrate to substrate. For example, increasing the etch time and temperature increases only the etch depth when etching polypropylene. On the other hand, both the degree of oxidation and etch depth increase with time for polyethylene.

Common uses polyolefins, ABS, polystyrene, polyphenyloxide, acetals

Corona Discharge
In a corona discharge process, the plastic is exposed to a corona discharge, usually in the presence of air and at atmospheric pressure. This roughens the surface, which provides sites for mechanical interlocking, and introduces reactive sites on the plastic's surface, consequently increasing the wettability and reactivity of the surface. The reactive functionalities which are theorized to be introduced to the surface may include, but are not proven to be, carbonyl, hydroxyl, hydroperoxide, aldehyde, ether, ester, and carboxylic acid groups, as well as unsaturated bonds.

Common uses polyolefins

Flame Treatment
Flame treatment increases the bondability of a plastic by oxidizing the surface through brief exposure to flame. The oxidation proceeds by a free radical mechanism, accompanied by chain scissions and some crosslinking. The functionalities introduced by oxidation are hydroxyl, carbonyl, carboxyl, and amide groups with a typical oxidation depth of approximately 4 to 9 nanometers. The improved bondability results from increased wettability, due to increased surface energy, and interfacial diffusivity, caused by chain scissions.

Common uses polyolefins, polyacetals, polyethylene, terephthalate

Iodine Treatment
Iodine treatment increases the bond strengths achieved on a substrate by altering the surface crystallinity from alpha form (where the N-H groups lie parallel to the surface) to beta form (where the N-H groups stand perpendicular to the surface). The surface remains relatively smooth after treatment, so it is believed that increased chemical reactivity, rather than mechanical interlocking is the mechanism for improved adhesion.

Common uses nylon

Plasma Treatment
Plasma treatment increases the bondability of a substrate by bombarding the substrate surface with ions of a gas, such as Ar2, He2, N2, and O2, at low pressure. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the enhanced bondability created by plasma treating. For example, plasma treatment is hypothesized to crosslink the substrate�s surface, which strengthens the joint boundary and prevents a thin layer of substrate from peeling off. In addition, the surface oxidation caused by plasma treatment is thought to introduce reactive functionalities which then increase the surface's reactivity and wettability. Another theory attributes plasma treatment�s effectiveness to an increased interfacial diffusion which is created by chain scissions in the substrate�s surface. Chain scissions increase the interfacial diffusion by lowering the surface viscosity and increasing the molecular mobility of the plastic�s surface.

Common uses polyolefins, polyesters, many more

Primers
Primers typically consist of a reactive chemical species dispersed in a solvent. To use the primer, the solution is brushed or sprayed onto the substrate surface. The carrier solvent is then allowed to flash off, leaving the active species behind. Depending on the type of primer, the surface may be ready to bond immediately, as in the case of polyolefin primers for cyanoacrylates, or may require time to react with atmospheric moisture before the application of the adhesive. Primers that must react with atmospheric moisture include silane nd isocyanate-based primers which are typically used for silicone and polyurethane-based adhesives, respectively. Surface primers generally improve substrate bondablility by acting as a chemical bridge between the substrate and the adhesive. Typically, the reactive species in a primer will be multifunctional, with one set of reactive groups that will preferentially react with the substrate surface, and additional groups that will have a high affinity for the adhesive.

Common uses acetals, fluoropolymers, polybutylene, terephthalate, polyolefins, polyurethane, silicone

Sodium Treatment
Sodium treatment is carried out by immersing the substrate in an aggressive etching solution containing either a sodium-naphthalene complex dissolved in tetrahydrofuran or a sodium-ammonia complex dissolved in ammonia. The etching process results in the dissolution of the amorphous regions of the substrate�s surface, consequently increasing the substrate�s surface roughness and potential for mechanical interlocking. Moreover, sodium treatment introduces unsaturated bonds, carbonyl groups, and carboxyl groups to the substrate�s surface, which increases the substrate's reactivity and wettability. Due to carbonaceous residue which results from the defluorination of the surface, sodium treatment darkens the surface to an approximate depth of 1 micrometer. The on-part life of the treatment is very long (years), however, heating and UV exposure rapidly degrade the treated surface. Major disadvantages of using sodium treatments are that extended exposure to the solution will result in a substantial degradation of the substrate�s surface, the etchants are highly hazardous, and that the solution degrades very rapidly in the presence of oxygen.

Common uses fluorocarbons

Surface Grafting
Surface grafting is accomplished by grafting a chemical species to the substrate�s surface which increases the substrate�s bondability. For example, polyethylene can be exposed to gamma radiation in the presence of vinyl acetate monomer, which then becomes chemically grafted to the polyethylene surface.

Common uses vinylic compounds on polyolefins

Surface Roughening
Surface roughening is a simple, low cost method of increasing the bondability of many plastics. Surface roughening increases the bondability by dramatically increasing the number of mechanical interlocking sites.

Common uses effective for many plastics

Thermal Treatment
Thermal treatment increases the bondability of plastics by exposing the plastic to a blast of hot air approximately 500�C), which oxidizes the surface. This mainly introduces carbonyl, carboxyl, and amide groups to the surface, but some hydroperoxide groups are also formed. Very similar to flame treatments, this process also utilizes a free radical mechanism accompanied by chain scission and some crosslinking. The improved bondability results from increased wettability, due to the introduction of polar groups, and interfacial diffusivity, caused by chain scissions.

Common uses polyolefins

Transcrystalline Growth
Transcrystalline growth improves bondability of a plastic by molding adherends against a high energy metallic substrate that induces trancrystalline growth in the plastic's surface regions. The metallic substrate induces the formation of crystallites at the plastic�s surface and results in rod-like or columnar spherulites that form inward from the interface. This is thought to strengthen the surface by driving low molecular weight material into the interior. In addition, some metallic substrates may oxidize the plastic�s surface, resulting in a substantial increase in the reactivity and wettability of the plastic's surface. The effectiveness of this treatment is dependent on such molding conditions as the cooling rate and mold surface.

Common uses polyolefins, polyamides, polyurethanes

UV Exposure
UV exposure increases the bondability of plastics by irradiating them with high intensity UV light. However, the effectiveness of UV exposure is very dependent on the wavelength of light being used. For example, light with a wavelength of 184 nm will crosslink the surface of polyethylene, while light at 253.7 nm will not. UV irradiation causes chain scissions, crosslinking, and oxidation of the polymer�s surface, even in inert gases. Many different mechanisms describing why UV exposure increases the bondability of plastics have been proposed, including: increasing the wettability; strengthening the plastic's boundary layer through crosslinking; and inducing hydrogen bonding. The predominant view is that the bondability is improved by the formation of polymeric scission products, which promote interfacial flow, interdiffusion, and polar interactions.

Common uses polyolefins

Structure of the materials

Factors that influence the adhesion - Stucture of the materials to be bonded

Besides the surface condition, the structure of the materials to be bonded is also of decisive importance. Porous materials (e. g. wood, paper, and textiles) absorb low viscosity adhesives.

The result of this adhesive's penetration are thin, uneven ("starved") joints which often impair the strength of the bond. On the other hand, the more volatile, i. e. low molecular substances, e.g. solvents, are absorbed by the capillaries preferably.

This process results in a rapid adhesion, but it can have a negative influence on the distribution of the polymer in the glue line owing to the simultaneous separation of oligomers. In addition, the solvent molecules compete with the adhesive molecules in regard to the adsorption.

The adhesive molecules are first adsorbed out of the adhesive solution through contact points separated by loops With progressing evaporation of the solvent, the adhesive molecules or segments are then adsorbed mainly at the surface.

The molecular structure of the adhesive is decisive for the cohesion, i. e. the state in which the particles of a single substance are held together, and in connection with the surface condition described above, for the adhesion. The principal molecular influencing factors are: the molecular weight or the distribution of the molecular weight, the number and size of the side-groups, and the polarity:

The macromolecules acting as an adhesive are either produced by a preceding polyreaction and then applied in the liquid form (solution, dispersion, or hot-melt) to the adherend, or they are produced by polyreactions of reactive low-molecular compounds in the glue line direct.

In the case of adhesives produced by preceeding polyreaction, the molecular weight must not be infinitely high (viscosity and solubility depend on the molecular weight)

With adhesives produced by polyreaction of reactive low-molecular compounds, it is frequently a desired objective to achieve a high molecular weight, which is often obtained by crosslinking reactions. The higher the molecular weight, the higher the tensile strength of linear polymers, which is a measure for the cohesion, as shown below.


Tensile strength (TS) of a polymer as a function of the degree of polymerisation DP (n)

TS = Tensile strength at the degree of polymerization DP n
TS = Tensile strength at infinitely high degree of polymerization
C = Polymer constant
DPn = Numerically average degree of polymerisation

The influence exerted by the side-groups of some polymers is also important. When increasing the size of the side-groups, owing a change of cristallinity within the polymer structure, the strength increase as well. The incorporation of large side-groups "loosens" the polymer structure. Some of the molecular regions become more volatile. This permits orientation of the polar adhesive groups to the surface.

Generally speaking, with increasing content of polar groups in the adhesive, the strength of the adhesion is improved.

Structure of the joint

Factors that influence the adhesion - Stucture of the joint

An important prerequisite for the successful use of bonding technology is that the respective parts be suitably designed for bonding, as distinct from welding, for example.

Care must be taken to provide a sufficiently large bonded area, such as a large area of overlap of the mating parts. The ideal bonded joint is one under all practical loading conditions the adhesives is stessed in the direction in which it most resists failure. Favorable stress can be applied to the bond by using proper joint design.

Tensile shear stress
Butt joint = unfavourable Simple butt joint = favourable
Bevelled joint = very favourable Double-strap butt joint = favourable
Shouldered double-strap butt joint = favourable but labour-intensive Double overlap = favourable

Bonded joints are particularly vulnerable to peeling stress and should therefore always be designed in such a way that the applied forces do not give rise to stress of this type.

Stress induced by shear forces
Pure peeling stress = unfavourable Tensile peeling stress = very unfavourable
Transformation into tensile and compressive stress = favourable Transformation into tensile shear stress = favourable
Combined rolling and peeling stress = very unfavourable Transformation into tensile and compressive stress = favourable
Reinforcement = favourable

However, some joint designs may be impractical, extensive to make, or hard to align. The design engineer will often have to weigh these factors against optimum adhesive performance.



Be the first to comment on "Factors that influence the adhesion"

Back to Top